From	Keith Briffa	Date	Fri Apr 4 14:26:42 1997
To	m.salmon@uea
Subject	from Rashit
>To: k.briffa@uea.ac.uk >Organization: ECOLOGY INSTITUTE >From: "Tatiana M. Dedkova" >Date: Mon, 9 Dec 96 14:19:37 +0500 >Return-Receipt-To: tatm@insec.quorus.e-burg.su >Subject: from Rashit >Return-Receipt-To: tatm@insec.quorus.e-burg.su >Lines: 106 > >Dear Keith, >we received your letters concerning our paper for Dendrochronologia >and three long chronologies. >1. As regards individual ring width data of living trees from >Yamal we would remind you that you have them. Stepan gave to you >in England one diskette. There are data for Larix sibirica from >three sites (KHA - from Khadyta river, 67812'N 69850'E; JAH - >from Yahody river 67807'N 69854'E and POR - from Portsa river >67827'N 71800'E) and for Picea obovata from two points (SCH - >Shtshutshya river 66849'N 69850'E and KHD - from Khadyta river >67807'N 69854'E). >2. We would be very gratefull if you can do some corrections and >additions in the paper for Dendrochronologia. We did not quite >understand what we have to do on missing rings? Just enumerate >years when missing rings occur? If so, these are following years: > > Year absent % ind % Year absent % ind % >-1172 1 of 4 25% 51 700 2 of 8 25% 31 >-1171 1 of 4 25% 12 707 1 of 9 11% 31 >-1168 1 of 4 25% 13 718 1 of 8 13% 33 >-1142 1 of 5 20% 50 773 1 of 8 13% 38 >-1127 1 of 5 20% 15 777 1 of 9 11% 67 >-1126 1 of 5 20% 10 814 3 of 9 33% 12 >-1029 1 of 10 10% 57 816 3 of 9 33% 10 >-1021 1 of 10 10% 55 818 3 of 10 30% 14 > -988 1 of 10 10% 17 867 1 of 11 9% 34 > -987 1 of 10 10% 12 903 1 of 11 9% 12 > -986 2 of 10 20% 17 904 1 of 10 10% 30 > -971 1 of 12 8% 44 914 1 of 9 11% 25 > -969 1 of 12 8% 67 915 1 of 9 11% 61 > -964 1 of 12 8% 14 959 1 of 10 10% 59 > -899 1 of 10 10% 29 1006 1 of 12 8% 28 > -886 1 of 9 11% 42 1007 1 of 12 8% 28 > -882 4 of 9 44% 5 1170 2 of 12 17% 8 > -860 1 of 11 9% 20 1259 1 of 10 10% 28 > -823 2 of 8 25% 18 1270 1 of 11 9% 36 > -792 1 of 6 17% 15 1278 3 of 11 27% 15 > -547 2 of 5 40% 61 1290 1 of 10 10% 44 > -543 1 of 6 17% 91 1300 1 of 9 11% 18 > -318 1 of 5 20% 29 1302 1 of 9 11% 58 > -294 1 of 5 20% 66 1323 1 of 7 14% 18 > -292 1 of 6 17% 24 1334 1 of 8 13% 53 > -288 1 of 6 17% 61 1342 1 of 9 11% 8 > -287 2 of 6 33% 25 1347 1 of 9 11% 14 > -261 1 of 5 20% 30 1380 1 of 12 8% 38 > -248 1 of 5 20% 13 1453 5 of 13 38% 9 > -246 1 of 5 20% 25 1456 1 of 13 8% 20 > -241 1 of 5 20% 12 1460 1 of 13 8% 24 > -239 1 of 5 20% 25 1466 1 of 12 8% 30 > -139 2 of 7 29% 9 1529 2 of 7 29% 10 > -119 1 of 7 14% 14 1560 1 of 7 14% 6 living > -118 1 of 7 14% 11 1714 1 of 11 9% 49 1 of 16 6% > 16 1 of 8 13% 26 1718 73 1 of 16 6% > 49 1 of 9 11% 11 1730 45 1 of 20 5% > 134 1 of 22 5% 33 1732 28 2 of 20 10% > 143 4 of 21 19% 7 1739 3 of 9 33% 50 1 of 20 5% > 155 1 of 21 5% 54 1742 23 3 of 20 15% > 207 1 of 16 6% 54 1749 57 1 of 20 5% > 426 1 of 6 17% 19 1752 67 1 of 21 5% > 492 1 of 9 11% 19 1755 72 1 of 21 5% > 493 1 of 9 11% 16 1783 39 1 of 22 5% > 495 1 of 9 11% 16 1788 83 1 of 22 5% > 536 1 of 12 8% 38 1789 92 1 of 22 5% > 546 1 of 12 8% 12 1795 102 1 of 22 5% > 579 1 of 16 6% 41 1806 68 1 of 22 5% > 589 1 of 19 5% 31 1808 97 1 of 22 5% > 596 1 of 18 6% 22 1812 35 1 of 22 5% > 598 1 of 18 6% 51 1814 54 1 of 22 5% > 623 3 of 17 18% 6 1815 30 1 of 22 5% > 636 2 of 17 12% 32 1816 2 of 3 67% 2 16 of 22 73% > 637 4 of 17 24% 9 1817 33 1 of 22 5% > 639 3 of 17 18% 9 1818 3 of 3 100% 4 14 of 22 64% > 640 7 of 17 41% 7 1819 22 6 of 22 27% > 644 1 of 18 6% 22 1820 1 of 3 33% 9 12 of 22 55% > 646 2 of 18 11% 26 1824 1 of 3 33% 66 > l i v i n g > 1825 2 of 22 9% 38 > 1828 1 of 22 5% 47 > 1831 5 of 22 23% 28 > 1833 4 of 22 18% 31 > 1837 1 of 22 5% 49 > 1867 3 of 23 13% 21 > 1882 1 of 23 4% 39 > 1883 1 of 23 4% 50 > 1884 1 of 23 4% 29 > 1885 1 of 23 4% 28 > 1889 1 of 24 4% 20 > 1891 1 of 24 4% 32 > 1903 2 of 24 8% 46 > 1934 1 of 24 4% 45 > 1946 1 of 24 4% 46 > 1947 1 of 24 4% 40 > 1967 1 of 20 5% 102 > 1971 1 of 20 5% 50 > 1975 1 of 20 5% 40 > >We have to note that frequency of missing rings on increment >cores of living trees higher, because on samples of subfossil >trees we try to find this kind of rings on whole disc. >Some periods are notable for missing rings: 988-964 BC, 882 BC, >143 AD, 623-646 AD (especially 640 AD), 814-816-818 AD, 1453 AD >and beginning of 1800th AD. >3. Stepan ask what about book by Bailey? >Best wishes, >Rashit > >