From	Tim Osborn	Date	Wed Dec 14 09:57:27 2005
To	Tom Wigley, Phil Jones
CC	Ben Santer
Subject	Re: HadCRUT2v
At 21:58 13/12/2005, Tom Wigley wrote: Phil, Before you finalize anything, please let me get back to you with some additional thoughts. There are some wrinkles that you and Tim don't seem to have thought of. Tom. Tom One further thing (possibly one of the extra wrinkles?) is that while you could put the S Pole data from CRUTEM2 (where it seems correct) into HadCRUT2, it isn't quite correct to put it (as I wrongly suggested) into CRUTEM2v and HadCRUT2v because those should have their high frequency deviations scaled to remove sample-size-related biases. Only a minor difference. Tim