E-mails de francis

Envoyés

DestinataireSujetDate

Reçus

EmetteurSujetDate
Phil JonesFuture DirectionsTue Mar 1 08:40:42 2005
Bette Otto-BliesnerRe: Senstivity, LGM and otherwiseWed, 13 Jul 2005 18:34:00 -0600 (MDT)
Gabi HegerlRe: 5 to 7 centuriesWed, 20 Sep 2006 12:37:42 -0400
Ben SanterRe: [Fwd: sorry to take your time up, but really do need a scrub of this singer/christy/etc effort]Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:58:12 -0800
Ben SanterRe: [Fwd: sorry to take your time up, but really do need a scrub of this singer/christy/etc effort]Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:58:12 -0800
Ben SanterRe: [Fwd: sorry to take your time up, but really do need a scrub of this singer/christy/etc effort]Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:31:15 -0800
Thomas R KarlRe: [Fwd: sorry to take your time up, but really do need a scrub of this singer/christy/etc effort]Sat, 15 Dec 2007 12:21:48 -0500
Leopold HaimbergerRe: [Fwd: sorry to take your time up, but really do need a scrub of this singer/christy/etc effort]Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:50:17 +0100
Ben SanterMore significance testingThu, 27 Dec 2007 16:26:19 -0800
Leopold HaimbergerRe: [Fwd: sorry to take your time up, but really do need a scrub of this singer/christy/etc effort]Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:10:30 +0100
Susan SolomonRe: Douglass et al. paperSun, 30 Dec 2007 10:18:04 -0700
Peter ThorneRe: Douglass et al. paperWed, 02 Jan 2008 10:08:31 +0000
Ben SanterRe: More significance testing stuffWed, 02 Jan 2008 20:52:31 -0800
Ben SanterUpdate on response to Douglass et al.Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:52:15 -0800
Dian J. SeidelRe: Update on response to Douglass et al.Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:40:28 -0500
Peter ThorneDian, something like this?Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:43:30 +0000
Phil JonesRe: Dian, something like this?Thu Jan 10 17:20:56 2008
Ben SanterRe: Update on response to Douglass et al., Dian, something like this?Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:07:03 -0800
Leopold HaimbergerRe: IJoC and Figure 4Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:33:28 +0100
John LanzanteRe: Updated FiguresSat, 12 Jan 2008 13:20:26 -0500
J ShuklaFuture of the IPCC:Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:46:33 -0500
Phil JonesReview Comments on the Wengen paperThu Jun 5 13:18:47 2008
Mike MacCrackenRe: Proposed experiment design for CMIP5Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:25:01 -0400
Gabi HegerlRe: comments on AR5 experimental design - reply by Aug 28 (thursday)Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:33:33 +0100
Gabi HegerlRE: Meeting Jan 21-23Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:51:24 +0100
Ben SanterData publishedThu, 15 Jan 2009 19:12:35 -0800
Ben SanterRe: Important: Input for FundingFri, 11 Sep 2009 08:30:19 -0700

Retour aux principaux protagonistes